Vol. 12, No. 1, April 1974 - "Convention Issue"
ATTRACTIVE AND REPULSIVE FORCES IN THE OUTER CITY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA
(pp. 3 - 5)
Dr. Donald P. Brandt
Edinboro State College
Ever since the mass movement to the "Outer City" began, urbanologists have searched for behavioral reasons to explain this exodus. Attraction or the "pulls" of suburbia and the fringe have been contrasted to the repulsions or "pushes" from the old central city. Seemingly, the attractive forces have consistently been the stronger. In fact, research within the past few years seems to indicate that the flight to the outer city would have occurred even if the inner city was devoid of its problems undefined so strong has been the allure of suburbia and beyond.
A COMPARISON AND CONTRAST OF THREE CORE AREAS OF EARLY URBAN TRANSPORTATION
(pp. 9 - 11)
Thomas J. Hannon
Slippery Rock State College
Vidal de la Blache suggested in effect that cities are made by transportation routes.1 If one assumes that physical topography or landforms determine the location of routes, the suggestion implies that, in an indirect way, landforms strongly influence the size and importance of cities as gathering or distribution nodes on some natural route presenting ease of access or, perhaps, a crossroad type location. In spite of the importance of site and situation, cities must have evolved from an embryonic state, and that evolution was, in most instances, more directly a function of human historic consequence. The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast three core areas of an early urban transformation: Mesopotamia, the Nile Valley and Mesoamerica (high civilization area of Middle America, Figures 1 and 2). It is not the task of this endeavor to analyze the site, situation or morphology of each of the representative cities shown, but rather it is the purpose to consider some possible reasons for the early urban transformation which gave rise to the city. City names indicated will be mentioned only as incidental.